Development, implementation and evaluation of a multinational FLS mentorship programme in Latin America.

Realising the benefits of systematic secondary fracture prevention requires supporting local sites to get started and becoming effective. We here describe the development, implementation and impact of a regional fracture liaison service (FLS) mentorship programme in Latin America that led to 64 FLS getting started and coverage of 17,205 patients. INTRODUCTION: Despite treatments and service models to deliver effective secondary fracture prevention, most patients are left untreated after a fragility fracture. To improve the capability to get FLS started and more effective, we describe the development, implementation and evaluation of an international programme to develop national communities of FLS mentors as part of the Capture the Fracture Partnership in Latin America. METHODS: The IOF regional team and the University of Oxford developed the curriculum and associated resources for training mentors in setting up FLS, service improvement and mentorship. Mentors were selected during a preparatory meeting, trained using live online sessions followed by regular mentor-led post-training meetings. The programme was evaluated using a pre-training needs assessment and post-training evaluation based on Moore's outcomes. RESULTS: The mentorship programme was initiated in Mexico, Brazil, Colombia and Argentina. The mentors were multidisciplinary, including orthopaedic surgery, rehabilitation, rheumatology, endocrinology, geriatrics, gynaecology and internal medicine. There was 100% participation in training sessions and reported satisfaction with the training. Since the initiation of the training programme, 22 FLS have been set up in Mexico, 30 in Brazil, 3 in Colombia and 9 in Argentina, in comparison with two in Chile and none in any other LATAM countries that were not involved in the mentorship programme. This equates to approximately 17,025 additional patients identified from 2019 to 2021 after initiation of mentorship. The mentors have engaged with 58 FLS for service development. Post-training activities include two published national best practice guidelines and other country-specific resources for FLS in the local language. CONCLUSION: Despite the COVID pandemic, the mentorship pillar of the Capture the Fracture Partnership has developed a community of FLS mentors with measurable improvement in national FLS provision. The programme is a potentially scalable platform to develop communities of mentors in other countries.

The Capture the Fracture® Partnership: an overview of a global initiative to increase the secondary fracture prevention care for patient benefit.

The Capture the Fracture® Partnership (CTF-P) is a unique collaboration between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, academic units and industry partners to enhance the implementation of effective, efficient fracture liaison services (FLSs) with a good patient experience. CTF-P has generated valuable resources for the specific countries as well as the broader FLS community to improve the initiation, effectiveness and sustainability of FLS in a wide range of healthcare settings.

Multiple myeloma screening within a fracture liaison service (FLS).

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable. Although early diagnosis improves outcomes, it has been unclear which populations to target for screening with serum electrophoresis, serum free light chains and urine electrophoresis. Here, we assessed the value of MM screening in a Fracture Liaison Service, finding that 1 per 195 fragility fractures has undiagnosed MM, which can be expedited to Haematology Services. PURPOSE: A key role of the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) is screening for secondary causes of osteoporosis. In 2019, the Royal Osteoporosis Society recommended that all patients attending FLS who are recommended anti-osteoporosis therapy have universal screening for myeloma based on serum electrophoresis, serum free light chains and urine electrophoresis. Here, we examined the impact of universal myeloma screening within an FLS. METHODS: We sampled all patients seen by the Oxfordshire FLS between January and April 2018. The completion rates and outcomes of screening were checked using the hospital and FLS databases. RESULTS: Of 950 patients identified by the FLS, 628 were eligible for MM screening; 473 (75%) of these were female, and the average age was 78.4 years. Overall, 584 had some form of myeloma screening, of which 577 (92%) had serum electrophoresis, 525 (84%) had serum free light chains and 407 (65%) had urine electrophoresis measured. A total of 327 (59%) patients had complete screening. Three patients (0.5%) had newly diagnosed myeloma and were urgently referred to Haematology Services. Furthermore, 46 (8%) patients had a detectable serum paraprotein with a likely diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS) and referred for community annual surveillance according to local guidelines. CONCLUSION: Addition of universal myeloma screening to laboratory testing identified myeloma in 1 per 195 patients, and its precursor state MGUS in 1 per 13 patients, which may have otherwise been missed. Further analysis with long-term follow-up is needed to clearly define the value of diagnosing MGUS within the FLS setting and establish the benefits vs. costs and methods to improve screening completion rates.